When
policymakers talk about “green jobs,” they tend to default to examples in solar
power, wind and other sources of renewable energy—or perhaps manufacturing and
supply chain management. They’re less likely to talk about agriculture.
That’s
a mistake. The way we eat and produce food is a significant contributor to
climate change. In fact, agriculture is estimated to contribute between 13% and
24% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Any “Green New Deal” needs to not only
enable innovation around sustainable agriculture, but also encourage farmers to
adopt new, environmentally friendly technologies.
American
agriculture is starting to enter the digital age. For years, agriculture lagged
behind as one of the least-digitized of any major industry in America. That’s
starting to change. More than half of farmers now use at least one “precision
agriculture” tool that harnesses data to improve efficiency on the farm.
Investors are starting to talk about precision agriculture as the next big
thing in IoT, and the market is expected to more than double from to $7.8
billion by 2022.

I spoke
with Village Capital's Allie Burns about this potential. For example,
data-driven tools can dramatically reduce the use of toxic pesticides by
tracking insect populations on a farm (see DTN’s recent acquisition of Spensa
Technologies), or help farmers monitor water and energy use through sensors and
cloud technology (see the example of Wexus Technologies). More generally, they
can help farmers grow more food with fewer resources.
This is
where the Green New Deal comes in. Burns pointed me to a recent Village Capital
and QBE Foundation report that discussed that although farmers have strong
incentives to adopt these sustainable agricultural technologies, many cannot
afford them, particularly in light of the economic downturn that farmers
currently face. With net farm incomes down 50% since 2013, many farmers simply
do not have the capital to invest in these cost-saving, environmentally
friendly solutions.
In
order to speed up the adaption of these energy saving technologies, Congress
should create a fund that covers a portion of the cost. A similar program for
electronic medical records incentives in the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (aka the stimulus) has been very successful in driving the adoption
of new technologies that have broadly shared societal benefits.

It’s
critical, however, that this Green New Deal program is designed in a way that
ensures that its benefits are broadly shared. In order to make sure that that
American taxpayers are not subsidizing offshore jobs, the program should
include a requirement for products to be manufactured domestically to qualify.
And to make sure that program helps entrepreneurs, Congress should set a cap on
the size of a company that can receive this subsidy. Rather than providing a
subsidy to John Deere, we want to grow the next generation of John Deeres.
Limiting this program to American entrepreneurs fosters the innovation and
competition that drives broad-based economic growth.
There’s
real opportunity for the Green New Deal to push American agriculture in a more
sustainable direction. As Village Capital’s Allie Burns said, “Oftentimes, ag
innovation doesn’t make it into the mainstream conversation about climate
change.” By creating an incentive for energy efficient agricultural
technologies, we can provide an incentive for farmers to support entrepreneurs
and American workers while preserving our environment.

No comments:
Post a Comment